Which AI API is the top choice for developing software: OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, or Anthropic’s Claude?

The AI game is heating up, y'all! When it comes to developing software, OpenAI's ChatGPT is the OG. With its affordable pricing and high quality output, it's the safe bet for now. Google's Gemini is still in training mode, so it's a no-go for production level software. And Anthropic's Claude? Not quite there yet, but could be an insurance play for preventing glitches. Bottom line, go with OpenAI - it's the real deal. Stay ahead of the game, folks! AI is the future. 💻🚀

🌟Introduction

As the artificial intelligence integrated software industry continues to emerge, the question of which AI provider to leverage becomes increasingly important. In this article, we will explore the cost associated with each model, their performance based on use case, and the process of creating a stable software platform with the emergence of new AI providers.

💰Cost Comparison Table

AI Provider	Model	Per 1,000 Tokens	Output
OpenAI	GPT-4	$0.01	$0.03
Google	Gemini	$0.025	$0.025
Anthropic	Claude	$0.005	$0.05

Every th tokens can be equated to approximately 750 words.

"We must ask ourselves which AI provider we want to start leveraging in our software. It's important to understand which model performs best depending on our use case and how to create a stable software platform with the emergence of these new AI providers."

🤖OpenAI’s ChatGPT

OpenAI's GPT-4 is one of the most advanced models in the industry, costing around one penny per 1,000 tokens and three pennies per th tokens output. GPT-3.5 Turbo, at $0.005 per 1,000 tokens and $0.015 per th000 tokens, offers promising quality in output.

According to the video comparing different models, OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo appears to be the most advanced model currently available.

🌐Google’s Gemini

Google's Gemini offers two models, Pro and Ultra. As of now, the access to Gemini Pro is at no cost, with pricing information for Google AI Studio yet to be determined. However, Gemini is still in a training mode, making it more suitable for testing than for full-scale production level software.

🚀Anthropic’s Claude

Anthropic's Claude offers a similar input and output style to GPT-3.5, with the pricing of $8 for 200,000 tokens and $0.8 per th000 tokens. While it has potential, it is yet to reach the same level of quality as GPT-4 Turbo.

"Proceed with open AI. Long term, this answer may change depending on other AI endpoints that may emerge in the future."

💡Utilizing Multiple AI Models

A strategy is suggested wherein the implementation of Anthropoc can serve as an insurance play in case of glitches or errors in software using GPT-4 Turbo. The diversity in the types of models available also brings value to the software development landscape.

📈Conclusion

In the expanding market of AI-powered software, the diverse pricing and quality of output between different models have slashed costs, making accessing AI APIs more accessible for developers. OpenAI remains the go-to choice for developers seeking stability and quality output for their software.

It is advised to proceed with the thorough exploration of OpenAI's API documentation while keeping an eye on new AI endpoints that may enter the market in the future. As of February 2024, the current recommendation is to proceed with OpenAI.

"Proceed with open AI. Long term, this answer may change depending on how well Gemini and Anthropic perform. Let me know what AI providers you're using in your software."

The article concludes with a recommendation to proceed with OpenAI as of February 2024 and emphasizes the importance of exploring new AI providers. The tone is informative and insightful, providing valuable guidance for decision-making in the emerging AI-powered software industry.